What is your waste process costing?
Not what a baler costs. What the current process costs — in hauling, in disposal, in handling time, and in material you are paying to throw away.
Adjust the inputs to match your operation.
Everything updates as you move. The result is an illustrative estimate built from figures you supplied — a starting point for a conversation, not a quote.
How this model works, and where it is deliberately conservative.
Most savings calculators in this industry do not show their assumptions. Here are ours, so you can argue with them.
Only part of your invoice can fall
The model assumes roughly 80% of your hauling and disposal spend varies with pickup frequency, and that the remaining 20% — container rental, base service, surcharges — does not move at all. Your actual split may differ, and contract minimums may make it less favourable.
Pickup reduction is capped at 50%
The raw volume math can suggest far larger reductions. The model refuses to show them, because service minimums, contract terms and practical scheduling almost always bind first. It also never drops below one pickup per week.
Compaction ratios are derated
The model achieves only about 70% of the ratio you select, because containers are not loaded evenly in practice and material varies day to day. A 4:1 machine is modelled closer to 3:1.
Not all cardboard reaches the baler
About 15% is assumed lost to contamination, moisture or simply being missed during a busy shift. That reduction applies to both the volume effect and the commodity value.
Labor savings are discounted
Only about 60% of the handling time you enter is counted as recoverable. Baling does not eliminate handling; it consolidates it. Some of that time comes back, not all of it.
Commodity value is your input, not our promise
The per-ton figure is a slider because we do not control it and neither does your equipment. Set it to zero and see whether the case still stands on hauling and labor alone. That is the more honest test.
Compaction ratio is a range, not a spec
You choose the ratio. General waste compactors are commonly cited at 4:1 to 5:1; cardboard balers considerably higher. Real performance depends on material, moisture, machine and loading practice.
Nothing here includes equipment cost
This model estimates the operating side only. It does not include purchase or lease cost, installation, power, maintenance or wire. A real payback analysis needs both halves, which is what the conversation is for.
The published figures behind the defaults.
Every benchmark used to set a default value or a hint in this calculator is public. Nichols does not publish invented statistics.
- Recovered cardboard (OCC) pricing: reported U.S. averages of roughly $45 to $62.50 per ton across early to mid 2026, with Los Angeles at $50 to $55 and San Francisco at $30 to $35 per ton in May 2026 (Fastmarkets); spot pricing near $100 per ton in July 2026 against a five-year average of about $140 per ton (Packaging Dive).
- Landfill tipping fees: national average of $56.80 per ton in 2023 and $62.28 per ton in 2024, with the Pacific region at $62.28 per ton in 2023 (Environmental Research & Education Foundation).
- Cardboard generation benchmarks: supermarkets 8 to 30+ tons per month, department stores 8 to 20+ tons, convenience stores 700 to 1,000 pounds (Connecticut DEEP).
- Waste composition: corrugated boxes at 11.4% of total U.S. municipal solid waste generation — the largest single product category — with a 96.5% recycling rate (EPA, most recent published data, 2018).
- Compaction ratios: 4:1 as a working figure for stationary compactors (Environment Canada); 4:1 to 5:1 commonly cited for general waste compactors (WasteCare).
- Collection cost and frequency: increasing collection from once to twice weekly raised costs by roughly 30% and fuel use by roughly 19% in a Florida study (Hinkley Center, University of Florida).
- Example published commercial rates: a 4-yard container collected weekly at $98.10 per month and an 8-yard at $170.60 per month (City of Frisco, Texas).
Nichols Sales does not set commodity prices, hauling rates or disposal fees, and does not warrant that any figure above will apply to your location or agreement. Published benchmarks are cited to show where default values came from, not to predict your result.
Bring the invoice, not the estimate.
The single most useful document in this whole process is a recent hauling invoice. It shows the real split between fixed and frequency-driven charges, the container sizes, the service schedule and the surcharges — which is everything this model has to assume.
See what compaction could do for your operation.
Estimated, not promised. Then verified, in person.